Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SFUSD presents schematic design for Mission Bay Block 14 elementary school; public raises environmental questions
Summary
SFUSD presented schematic plans for a 500‑student Mission Bay elementary on Block 14, emphasizing site setbacks to reduce exposure to freeway particulates and a linked learning hub. Members of the public urged thorough CEQA and cleanup review; SFUSD said technical studies and DTSC/CDE reviews are underway.
San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) staff presented a schematic design Feb. 16 for a 500‑student elementary school on Mission Bay’s Block 14 and described program elements intended to make the building a community asset while minimizing environmental exposures.
Gretchen Heckman, a development specialist at OCII, introduced the item and noted a jurisdictional difference: OCII’s planning documents list the block as a public facility but the district asserts independent authority. OCII staff recommended a workshop review rather than an action item; SFUSD said it would return if major design changes occur.
Design and program: SFUSD project managers Sarah Price and Kristen Raymond walked commissioners through a four‑story academic wing plus a two‑story support wing, an L‑shaped plan that shields the play yard from adjacent freeway noise and particulates, an indoor‑outdoor multipurpose space for community use, and a fourth‑floor Linked Learning Hub intended for district‑wide STEM pathways and internships. Renderings showed natural‑material facade treatment and landscaped yards designed to replace traditional asphalt playgrounds.
Environmental and regulatory assurances: Public commenters raised environmental concerns. Francisco de Costa said past contamination and nearby infrastructure (a PUC pump) warranted rigorous review and cautioned against using references to the Ohlone for optics without substantive consultation. SFUSD responded that air‑quality monitoring informed site placement, that technical studies are part of the CEQA process and that the school will comply with the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the California Department of Education (CDE) and Division of the State Architect before permitting.
Operational details: SFUSD said the schematic is preliminary and may be value‑engineered against budget constraints. The district noted it is not bound by OCII contract and workforce goals but has executed a Proposition A Project Labor Agreement with local hiring goals (25% of total and 50% of apprentice hours local). SFUSD expects to hire a design‑build contractor later in 2021, UCSF to deliver the parcel after mapping, and construction to begin in 2023 with completion in 2025, subject to environmental review and permitting.
Public reaction and next steps: Mission Bay CAC members and residents who called in generally supported the design and outreach process; others urged careful environmental evaluation. Commissioners requested updates as SFUSD’s CEQA technical studies progress and asked staff to continue coordination. The item was a workshop only; no action was taken on the school design at this meeting.
