Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Eser Emergency Water topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge prioritizing firefighting water and coverage maps in ESER bond planning

Seagull Bank Committee · August 26, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public commenters urged the committee to prioritize auxiliary water supply and emergency firefighting water projects within the ESER bond program, to produce neighborhood coverage mapping, and to reconsider lower-priority office projects in favor of firefighting readiness.

During the public-comment period, residents raised concerns about earthquake and firefighting water readiness and asked for the Citizens Bond Oversight Committee to press ESER (Emergency Seismic and Emergency Response) managers for clearer plans.

Kermit Kubitz of the Sherwood Forest neighborhood urged the committee to prioritize auxiliary water supplies and emergency firefighting water systems rather than lower-priority office projects such as traffic forensics or medical examiner offices. He cited a July 17 civil grand jury report, "Act Now Before It Is Too Late, Aggressively Expand and Enhance Our Emergency Firefighting Water System," and asked whether the mayor, Board of Supervisors and ESER management agree with the grand jury's analysis and whether the city can provide interim portable water systems to fill gaps.

Kubitz requested that ESER reporting provide mapping data showing which neighborhoods have adequate firefighting water coverage rather than only budgets and expenditure tabulations; he highlighted Sunset and Bayview-Hunters Point as areas of low reliability and said the financial district was shown as having adequate reliability in the grand jury table he displayed.

Committee members acknowledged the comment and the civil grand jury's report was discussed later in the meeting in relation to bond oversight. No committee action was recorded in direct response to the public comment during this meeting.