Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure And Fire Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenters urge disaster council to report on Geary/Parker gas explosion, water-supply and hydrant planning

San Francisco Disaster Council · April 5, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public speakers told the Disaster Council it should have reported initial departmental responses to the Geary/Parker gas explosion and pressed for updated plans on firefighting water supplies, AWSS expansion and gas-line mapping after the incident.

Two public commenters used the council’s public-comment period to press for more information and follow-up after the recent explosion at Geary and Parker Streets.

Nancy Werfel told the council she expected an initial report from departments including fire, PUC, police and PG&E and urged review of the city’s firefighting annexes and water-utilities annex, which she said have not been updated since February 2008. Werfel warned that gaps in gas-line mapping and the absence of clear planning on how potable and nonpotable water would be used for firefighting deserve immediate attention.

Thomas Didier, a retired assistant deputy chief of the San Francisco Fire Department, said the Geary/Parker incident illustrated the intensity of fires that could result from many gas-line ruptures after a major earthquake. He noted that prolonged fire suppression needs were exacerbated by the 2½-hour interval he said PG&E needed to shut off gas at the site of the explosion, and warned that neighborhoods without AWSS hydrants face high risk of uncontrollable fire spread in a major seismic event.

What’s next: Commenters asked the council to place these emergency response and water-supply topics on a future agenda for formal departmental reports and recommendations. Council staff did not make a formal scheduling decision during the meeting.