Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accela Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independent assessment finds Accela platform viable but calls for governance reset and rebaseline
Summary
Gartner presented a 150‑page assessment of the Accela (Acela) permitting project, concluding the platform can meet DBI needs with configuration but recommending a restart: rebalance requirements, strengthen governance and project management, secure dedicated DBI resources, and adopt a staged go/no‑go plan before proceeding to full implementation.
San Francisco — An independent assessment from Gartner concluded on June 15 that the Accela (referred to in materials as Acela) permitting platform can meet San Francisco Department of Building Inspection requirements with appropriate configuration, but that the project’s failures so far stem from governance breakdowns, incomplete requirements, turnover and inconsistent project management.
Paul Denfort and Gartner colleagues told the Building Inspection Commission that their review of the project’s documentation, configurations and governance recommended three immediate steps: establish a mutually agreed set of functional requirements, set a single, accountable executive sponsor on both sides, and create a dedicated on‑site project team with testing leadership and backfill for DBI subject‑matter experts.
Gartner also recommended a formal memorandum of understanding and a staged go/no‑go decision to set realistic timelines and to clarify the vendor’s and the city’s commitments. "We do believe that the native capabilities of the Accela platform can meet DBI's needs," the assessment said, but the firm cautioned that prior underestimates of complexity and resource requirements have driven the project off track.
City IT leadership (City CIO Miguel Gamino) and the vendor representatives in the room acknowledged the assessment and said steps were underway: an RFP for project‑management consulting had been issued, and city and vendor parties signaled readiness to pursue the rebaseline and governance changes Gartner recommends.
Why it matters: The permitting system is a core operational element for DBI and other city departments. Gartner estimated that a properly resourced program could reach go‑live within a timeframe that depends on the scope baseline and resourcing choices; the firm suggested 9–12 months to implementation after rebaselining, though it emphasized a near‑term phase (2–4 months) to rebalance objectives and sign a go/no‑go memorandum.
What’s next: The city issued an RFP June 8 for project‑management consulting to support the restart; Gartner said it would be appropriate to formalize a steering committee, testing lead, and external oversight in the next steps.
