Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent calendar with recusals; returns from closed session to authorize settlement and approve personnel charges
Summary
The Board approved the consent calendar after a recorded roll call (with Commissioner Kim recusing from select Symphony items). After recessing to closed session the board authorized payment up to a stipulated amount in an OAH student case, directed general counsel on anticipated litigation, and approved a proposed statement of charges against a permanent certificated employee; each closed‑session action passed by recorded votes.
The San Francisco Board of Education approved the consent calendar after a motion and roll‑call vote in which Commissioner Kim announced recusals from specific items related to the San Francisco Symphony (items F6, F11 and F12). The roll call recorded Commissioner Bogus voting No and Commissioners Fisher, Lam, Kim (recusing on the noted items), Sanchez, Wiseman Ward and President Alexander voting Yes; the board recorded the consent calendar as passing with six ayes.
The meeting recessed to closed session and later returned for a public report‑out. The board reported three formal closed‑session actions: in the matter of student GB v. SFUSD (OAH case no. 2024080362) the board, by a recorded vote of seven ayes, authorized the district to pay up to the stipulated amount; in an anticipated‑litigation matter the board, by seven ayes, gave direction to the general counsel; and in a public‑employee dismissal/discipline matter the board, by seven ayes, approved a proposed statement of charges against a permanent certificated employee.
The meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. President Alexander thanked interpreters and closed the session.
Records and next steps: the board recorded recusals on the public consent items and the closed‑session report‑out lists the OAH case number (2024080362) and the three actions taken; detailed settlement amounts and personnel documents were not read into the public record during the report‑out.
