Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the College Career Readiness topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

SFUSD reports on early‑warning indicators: exit rate below target; staff outline tutoring and case management steps

San Francisco Board of Education · September 24, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

High‑school staff reported an Early Warning Indicator (EWI) exit goal of 25% but recorded a 19% exit rate (65 of 367 students); the district described coordinated care teams, tutoring, 7‑period schedules and plans to dig into subgroup patterns and grading‑for‑equity efforts.

High‑school leaders presented the district’s work on early‑warning indicators (EWI) for ninth‑grade students and described efforts to raise exit rates for students who enter high school with attendance or GPA concerns.

Divina Goldwasser said the district set a goal of a 25% exit rate but reached 19% for the cohort cited — 65 students exited the EWI list versus an expected 91. She described school‑level strategies including coordinated care teams, expanded common planning under a 7‑period schedule, tutoring, one‑on‑one case management by counselors, and strategic course scheduling to allow in‑day credit recovery.

Board members asked why exit rates were higher in 2019 (28%) and requested subgroup breakdowns. Patrick from Research, Planning and Assessment said staff are breaking out the EWI population by subgroup, by reason for EWI (attendance, GPA, or both), and by IEP status to better target strategies. Commissioners pressed for quicker analysis and for specific approaches to support African American students and other focal groups with low exit rates.

Commissioners also asked about grading‑for‑equity work and counselor training; staff said grading‑for‑equity is a year‑long learning strand for assistant principals and that the district will follow up with deeper analyses and appendix slides showing subgroup data.

Next steps: staff will provide further subgroup breakdowns, share early findings on what worked for students who exited, and return with more detailed strategy reporting ahead of the next monitoring checkpoint.