Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Building Code topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves code change letting DBI use multiple data sources for permit valuations

Building Inspection Commission · December 17, 2014

Summary

The Commission unanimously approved amending Building Code section 107A.0.2 to restore language allowing the building official to use Marshall & Swift valuations or other authorized data sources when producing the cost schedule used to calculate permit fees, a change DBI said helps value unique San Francisco items such as tower cranes and seismic work.

Kirk Means of DBI Technical Services told the Commission on Dec. 17 that the department seeks a code amendment to allow the building official to reference "various data sources" when publishing the cost schedule for permit valuations. Means said San Francisco requires flexibility because specialized items — tower cranes, seismic upgrades and remodeling work — are not always covered uniformly in a single national valuation source.

"The code change would allow us to continue to gather information from authorized sources that help us put together these costs to help the general public come up with the valuations that their permit fees are charged based on," Means said. He described the cost schedule as a benchmark that ensures consistent fee calculations across similar projects even when exact costs vary.

Commissioner Walker moved to amend Building Code section 107A.0.2 to refer to multiple data sources for the cost schedule; the motion was seconded and passed on a unanimous roll‑call vote.

What happens next: DBI will draft the ordinance language and proceed with the normal legislative/administrative process to update the code and the published cost schedule used to compute permit fees.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source