Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Board tables and ultimately does not accept Guardrail 3 monitoring report after questions on curriculum alignment and data
Summary
Board members debated Guardrail 3 (curriculum and instruction) monitoring, heard a presentation on district coaching and interim measures, requested disaggregated data and a curriculum inventory, moved to table the report and later voted that the monitoring report was not accepted; staff will return with revised interim measures and additional data.
The board considered a progress-monitoring report for Guardrail 3, which oversees curriculum and instruction district-wide. Staff presented three interim measures — classroom observations focused on essential content (3.1), teacher use of data (3.2) and teacher feedback (3.3) — and reported mixed results: 73% of visited classrooms showed a focus on essential content (on track for 3.1), while measures for data use and feedback were off track.
Dr. Jeanette Hernandez, Executive Director for Professional Learning and Coaching, described a district coaching model and said the district piloted coaching with 15 volunteer coaches in the spring and hired coaches for fall. Principals and…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
