Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Refunding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
OCII authorizes pursuit of up to $300M in refunding bonds to lower debt service
Summary
The Commission authorized staff to pursue issuance of taxable and tax‑exempt refunding tax allocation bonds not to exceed $300 million to refund outstanding debt and lower tax‑increment debt service; staff cited potential present‑value savings and a two‑series structure, and commissioners approved the authorization by voice vote.
The Commission authorized staff to pursue issuance of taxable and tax‑exempt refunding tax allocation bonds in a combined amount not to exceed $300,000,000 to refinance portions of OCII’s debt portfolio and reduce tax‑increment debt service costs.
John Daigle, senior financial analyst, described a two‑series structure in the proposed authorization: a taxable Series B not to exceed $110 million and a tax‑exempt Series C not to exceed $190 million. Staff explained that the refunding could be structured to refund roughly $190 million initially and generate present‑value savings of approximately $13 million on those candidates; if market conditions improve additional bonds could be included up to the $300 million not‑to‑exceed cap. The resolution sets not‑to‑exceed limits on principal, interest rate and underwriter discount and allows OCII to proceed with oversight‑board and Department of Finance approvals and later underwriter selection and sale.
Daigle and staff described benefits of a new subordinated credit structure that would allow bonds to be issued directly by OCII supported by RPTTF funds rather than project‑area‑specific loans, simplifying credit and administration. Commissioners asked for clarification on what the proceeds would be used for; staff said proceeds are intended to refund outstanding debt and pay related issuance costs and that refunding can save tax‑increment dollars under current low interest rates.
The Commission moved and approved the authorization by roll‑call (3–0). Staff outlined a timeline that included Oversight Board action on Sept. 22, Department of Finance review, selection of underwriters in October, and a planned closing before year‑end if market conditions permit.
