Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement And Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BIC litigation committee reports roughly 80 open enforcement cases, seeks clearer City Attorney reporting
Summary
The commission's litigation committee reported about 80 open enforcement cases (mix of housing and building matters), estimated court-determined judgments around $6 million and department litigation expenditures of roughly $9 million over five years; commissioners asked the City Attorney for a concise, shareable status report.
Commissioner Walker, speaking for the Building Inspection Commission's litigation committee, gave an overview of how the committee evaluates unresolved notices of violation and decides whether to refer cases to the City Attorney for litigation. Walker said the committee meets every couple of months in closed session to review cases and noted the committee currently has roughly 80 active matters under review.
Walker said the committee's open matters represent a mix of building- and housing-division cases and that the cases carry court-determined judgments and settlement amounts that the committee tracks; he reported approximately $6 million in court-determined amounts among cases with determinations and said many other cases have amounts yet to be determined. DBI Deputy Pamela Levin told the commission the department has recorded about $9 million in litigation spending over the multi-year period reviewed and about $5.5 million in recoveries during that same period.
Commissioners asked for more accessible information about case status, costs and outcomes that could be shared in public meetings where appropriate. The committee asked the City Attorney to provide a succinct, regularly updated report listing open cases, brief descriptions and current status; the City Attorney agreed to prepare a format that can be reviewed and, where necessary, redacted for privilege before broader distribution.
Next steps: The City Attorney and DBI will collaborate to produce a condensed status report suitable for public circulation (with closed-session details reserved as needed); the litigation committee will meet again to monitor priorities and referrals.
