Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SF school board meeting turns to racial harm and calls for restorative process after resurfaced tweets
Summary
Board members and more than a thousand public commenters spent much of the meeting responding to resurfaced 2016 tweets by Commissioner Allison Collins; students, community groups and elected officials debated whether resignation or restorative justice is the right next step.
President Lopez opened the meeting by denouncing anti-Asian discrimination and announcing dedicated restorative spaces for the district to confront racial harm.
The board then spent a lengthy portion of its meeting on calls from students, parents and community leaders demanding accountability for resurfaced tweets by Commissioner Allison Collins. Student speakers told the board they felt hurt and unrepresented; one student delegate said: "I have never felt seen in my history class," and urged the board to adopt measures that help students see themselves in the curriculum. Several student and community callers said Collins' language was racist and asked that she resign. Other callers defended Collins, calling the timing politically motivated and urging restorative practices instead of removal.
Several commissioners framed their remarks as invitations to listen and to pursue restorative processes. Commissioner Lam said the district must "acknowledge the harm and make the intentional effort to connect with those in the community that have been harmed," while Commissioner Alexander emphasized restorative practices as a pillar of district work. President Lopez reminded the public the board could not debate or vote during public comment but said the district would provide additional, structured opportunities for dialogue.
The board did not take immediate personnel action during the meeting on that matter; instead, commissioners directed staff and legal counsel to continue work on community-engagement and restorative options and to provide follow-up opportunities. The board also opened both support and opposition comment periods (20 minutes each) to try to balance public input.
What's next: the district said it would create additional restorative spaces and continue to accept public comment on the matter; the board did not announce any formal disciplinary steps during this meeting.
