Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SFUSD delays final budget vote after weeks of public pressure over cuts to paras and special‑ed supports
Summary
The San Francisco school board postponed approving its 2020–21 budget after hours of testimony from teachers, paraeducators, parents and unions who warned that proposed cuts would disproportionately hit the district's most vulnerable students. Staff will return with revised materials and a targeted study session before a new vote date.
The San Francisco Unified School District board on June 23 declined to finalize its fiscal 2020–21 budget, opting instead to postpone a vote after public and commissioner objections to proposed reductions that would affect paraeducators, family liaisons and other site‑level supports.
The board meeting culminated in hours of public testimony from hundreds of teachers, parents, classified staff and union representatives who urged delay. Many said the administration’s late‑breaking numbers and the district’s shifting assumptions about state aid made it impossible to evaluate the proposal fairly. "We cannot finalize something while the gears are still in motion," said Megan Kaluza, a behavior analyst with SFUSD.
Why it matters: The district faces an estimated structural shortfall driven by long‑term underfunding and new COVID‑19 costs. Staff told the board that Governor Newsom’s budget action and ongoing legislative negotiations will restore some funding (staff estimated a partial LCFF restoration of roughly $43 million), but a significant gap could remain. District leaders said they had rebalanced several internal lines, consolidated dual‑funded programs and moved some activities to other funds, but commissioners and public speakers said the reallocation lacked transparency.
What the board did: After an extended debate among commissioners — several of whom said they wanted time to review central‑office cuts and site‑level impacts in a single, unified picture — the board agreed to postpone the final adoption of the district budget. Staff will prepare revised exhibits and post them in advance of a dedicated study session later that week and a follow‑up public meeting with the aim of having a technically complete submission to the California Department of Education in mid‑July if possible.
Key points from staff: Chief Financial Officer Megan Wallace told the board the budget in front of them reflected the May state budget assumptions and a projected May‑to‑July reduction in local revenue tied to the pandemic. The district’s May estimate showed a shortfall near $77.4 million; staff said restoration of LCFF funding would reduce that number but other risk factors remain, including added reopening costs that could exceed $20 million.
What advocates asked for: UESF, SEIU and parent groups asked the board to protect site personnel first — paraeducators, family liaisons, custodians and nutrition workers — rather than making cuts that would fall on lower‑paid, largely Black and Brown employees. Several speakers urged the board to require larger central‑office reductions or alternative revenue strategies before reducing frontline services.
Next steps: Staff will post an expanded FAQ and additional line‑by‑line exhibits for commissioners and the public; the board scheduled working sessions to review the revised materials and asked staff to model alternatives that preserve site staff wherever possible. The district emphasized its intent to treat any interim vote as a baseline that will be revisited when state fiscal details firm up.
The board’s postponement granted more time to reconcile labor negotiations, state income assumptions and community priorities; it did not constitute a final budget decision.
