Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Permit Tracking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Francisco officials weigh permit-notification gaps and new extension rules

San Francisco Planning Commission and Department of Building Inspection (joint meeting) · May 7, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning and Building Inspection staff told commissioners they currently track permit expirations manually and are proposing code and software changes to permit multiple extensions while ensuring projects still meet updated codes. Staff said an integrated permit-tracking system could automate notifications.

San Francisco planning commissioners and Department of Building Inspection (DBI) staff discussed gaps in tracking issued permits and proposed fixes at a joint meeting. DBI and Planning staff said the city currently reviews issued permits manually and that the system does not automatically notify departments when permits near expiration. “Currently, the system does not automatically notify us when a permit is expired,” said Vivian Dake of the Department of Building Inspection.

The discussion focused on how extensions and vesting are handled when construction pauses. Planning staff said entitlements granted through public hearings typically last two to three years and that extensions historically were sometimes routed without full review. Planning staff said they now route more extensions to ensure projects still conform to updated codes. “We really need to review to make sure that they still conform to the code,” a planning representative said, noting code changes in recent years.

DBI described a proposed ordinance to allow more than one permit extension and stressed that any extension must be coordinated with Planning so new planning codes are not inadvertently overridden. Director Day and DBI staff said the legislation would likely go before the Board of Supervisors and, if adopted on schedule, could take effect July 1. Staff emphasized that before granting an extension they intend to verify whether projects remain viable and compliant with current codes.

Commissioners and private-sector speakers pressed for automated notifications and better interdepartmental routing so that plan check conditions reach field inspectors. Sam Quang, project manager for the city’s Permit and Project Tracking System (PPTS), said the forthcoming system is designed to bring schedules and conditions into a single database so inspectors and applicants can see active conditions and timelines.

The commission asked staff to provide procedures and a clearer public-facing explanation of how code years and grandfathering apply to projects that resume after long dormancy. Members also requested that staff flag projects likely to be abandoned or needing assistance so commissioners can consider broader policy responses. The meeting closed with a promise from staff to draft clearer procedures and pursue both code changes and software improvements to reduce manual tracking.