Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parents and community members press board on school placements, teacher contracts and homelessness supports

San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education · March 13, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment the board heard appeals from KIPP Bay Area about Prop 39 placement decisions, Lafayette parents seeking renewal of a teacher’s contract, and a homeless parent alleging excessive suspension and retaliation; the superintendent said staff would follow up with supports and investigations.

The board heard multiple public comments on March 13 from parents and community organizations seeking district action on separate matters.

Anthony Wilson of KIPP Bay Area urged the board to reconsider a Prop 39 site placement that he said would displace Bayview students and drive busing rather than keeping students in the neighborhood. He asked staff and commissioners to work in partnership to keep Bayview students in local schools.

Parents from Lafayette Elementary (Room 107) asked the board to renew a teacher’s contract they said had been non-renewed despite strong performance and community support. Speakers described the teacher’s work with diverse learners and asked the district to restore or reconsider the assignment.

A parent, Sabrina Hall, described ongoing problems after a family move and alleged that her ninth-grade daughter at John O'Connell had been excessively suspended (27 days to date), harassed by a dean and is now facing expulsion. She said district channels had not provided timely help; the superintendent asked staff to connect her with Family and Youth in Transition supports and student-services staff for case follow-up.

The board received these comments during the public-comment period and asked staff to follow up where appropriate; no formal board actions were announced during the meeting on these items.