Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Labor Relations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Teachers and union leaders criticize tentative bargaining offers at SFUSD board meeting

San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education · May 13, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Several UESF leaders and teachers used public comment to denounce a reported district negotiating offer (2% this year), calling it insulting and insufficient given rising local costs; speakers warned of potential labor actions and urged the board to prioritize classroom compensation.

During the public comment period, multiple speakers representing the United Educators of San Francisco and classroom staff strongly criticized the district’s recent negotiating posture and a reported offer that union speakers characterized as an insult to educators.

Susan Solomon, Executive Vice President of United Educators of San Francisco, told the board the bargaining day had been ‘‘a very disappointing day in bargaining’’ and described an offer of 2% for the first year, 3% for the next two years and limited para‑professional longevity pay (10¢ per hour after 15 years). She said this offer provided no reopeners or recognition for advanced degrees and called the package disrespectful to educators’ work. Dennis Kelly (UESF president) and several bargaining team members reiterated those concerns and described members as ‘‘infuriated’’ and ‘‘hurt’’ by the terms presented at the bargaining table.

Teachers and bargaining team members detailed cost‑of‑living pressures in San Francisco and noted the money contributed back by employees in past years, arguing that current and expected revenue increases (including Prop 30 and state allocations) should be used to increase classroom compensation. Speakers asked the board to prioritize classroom funding, paraprofessional recognition and to take bargaining commitments seriously. No district negotiator presented a direct rebuttal during public comment; the superintendent thanked speakers and acknowledged the comments for the record.