Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

SFUSD board votes to let schools set head‑covering policies and bars suspension for dress‑code violations

San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education · May 13, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a resolution asking the superintendent to update the student and parent handbook so schools may set their own policies on hats and head coverings, ensure religious head coverings are allowed, and remove suspension/expulsion as punishments for dress code violations; vote was 7 ayes.

Commissioner Matt Haney read a resolution asking the superintendent to update the SFUSD Student and Parent Handbook for 2014–15 to allow schools to set their own policies regarding hats and other head coverings, explicitly allow head coverings worn for religious reasons and outdoor wear as required by state law, remove archaic provisions of the dress standards and remove any explicit authorization to suspend or expel a student for dress‑code violations.

Haney said the resolution aims to reflect current practice at many high schools that moved toward inclusive processes and reduce time spent policing minor dress issues. Board members stressed the need for baseline language and principal input to avoid arbitrary enforcement and asked staff to share the line‑by‑line committee review that identifies provisions proposed for removal. The resolution requests that the superintendent disseminate amended standards and provide training to principals before the 2014–15 school year and that dress standards be developed inclusively with school communities.

The board took a roll‑call vote and approved the resolution; commissioners present recorded seven ayes. Members emphasized they supported the principle of school‑level autonomy while asking staff to return with specific line edits and a plan to ensure consistent application across sites.