Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dual Enrollment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board holds public hearing on City College–SFUSD dual‑enrollment partnership; formal adoption set for Oct. 25

Board of Education, San Francisco Unified School District · October 11, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board held a public hearing on a proposed CCAP dual‑enrollment agreement between City College of San Francisco and SFUSD (AB 288 / Ed. Code 76004(b)). Staff presented the statutory requirement and commissioners requested baseline data on participation and demographics before the Oct. 25 adoption vote.

The Board of Education opened a public hearing on Oct. 11 to present a City College of San Francisco–SFUSD dual‑enrollment partnership agreement as required by AB 288 and Education Code 76004(b). Deputy Superintendent Guerrero summarized the legal framework and said the governing boards of both districts must present and then take public comment before any subsequent approval.

Guerrero explained that the CCAP framework (College and Career Access Pathways) allows a participating community college district to enter a partnership agreement with a school district; final adoption by the SFUSD board is scheduled for the regular Oct. 25 meeting. Commissioners asked staff to provide data ahead of that vote, requesting information on current student participation levels, which courses are offered under existing arrangements, and demographic breakdowns by race and school site.

Commissioner Walton said the partnership will allow students to take up to 15 college units on high‑school campuses with prioritized access over adult learners. Other commissioners asked staff to circulate participation data electronically rather than requiring an in‑meeting presentation.

No formal adoption occurred on Oct. 11; the hearing fulfilled the informational requirement under state law and the item will return to the board for a vote on Oct. 25.