Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tobacco Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SFUSD board backs city ordinance to bar tobacco and e-cigarette sales to 18–20-year-olds
Summary
The board voted unanimously to support a proposed Board of Supervisors ordinance that would prohibit sale of tobacco products and e-cigarettes to people aged 18–20; Department of Public Health staff described enforcement (permit suspensions and fines) and education plans.
The San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education on Jan. 26 unanimously passed a resolution supporting proposed city legislation (File 151179) that would prohibit retailers from selling tobacco products and electronic cigarettes to persons aged 18, 19 or 20.
Vice President Walton and student delegates introduced the measure and Supervisor Scott Wiener, a coauthor of the ordinance, attended and addressed the board. Wiener said San Francisco has the resources to defend the policy against industry lawsuits and described the proposal as a public-health intervention intended to delay initiation of tobacco use.
Derek Smith of the San Francisco Department of Public Health explained enforcement plans, including ongoing decoy operations with police and a permit-suspension process for retailers that sell to underage buyers. Janine Young, an environmental health inspector, described the suspension process and said first-time violations can yield reduced suspension periods, and suspension lengths may range up to 25 days depending on severity and repeat violations.
Board members asked about public education, impacts on students who turn 18 during senior year, retailer density near schools and whether the ordinance covers vaping shops. Staff confirmed the proposal includes e-cigarettes and that the health department plans a sticker campaign and community outreach to inform stores, students and parents.
The board voted unanimously to adopt the resolution of support and requested continued coordination between the district and the Department of Public Health if the ordinance proceeds through the supervisors’ process.
