Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Teacher Pipeline Grant topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves federal seed grant partnership after debate over outside provider and district control

San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education · November 10, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board voted to approve a federally funded seed grant to support a teacher-pipeline program in partnership with an outside organization; some commissioners and union representatives urged clearer labor involvement and early board notification about third-party grantees.

The San Francisco Unified School District board voted on Nov. 10 to approve a severed consent item authorizing participation in a federally funded seed grant designed to expand teacher recruitment and preparation in the district.

Commissioner Winns led a sustained critique of the arrangement, saying the district had effectively been asked to participate in a program designed and led by an outside nonprofit that favors accelerated credentialing models. "I am not going to support this," Winns said in explanation of her opposition, calling for the board to have earlier notice and for district-led credentialing options. Winns questioned whether the model would adequately address shortages in specific credential areas, such as special education, and raised concerns about relying on private entities to implement training that the district could develop in-house.

Other commissioners emphasized that labor partners and district staff would participate in program design. Commissioner Fuell and others stressed that any effective pipeline needed strong retention supports, such as in-class coaching for new teachers, and noted existing local programs (for example, the San Francisco teacher residency program) that could inform the design. Superintendent Carranza and district staff said past personnel-labor committee conversations and recent meetings with labor and academic teams gave confidence that the district could shape the grant's design to reflect local needs.

The motion on the severed item (seed grant / item B5) was put to roll call and passed. The transcript records individual roll-call responses as read into the record; the chair announced the outcome after the vote was completed.

Board members asked staff to return with a process for earlier notification when the district participates in federally funded partnerships that use outside grantees and to involve labor and academic leaders in program design and implementation. Commissioner Winns requested a rules-committee referral to develop a procedure so the board is informed earlier in similar partnerships.

The vote and ensuing discussion underline a tension the board is wrestling with: how to accept external funding and partners while preserving district control, labor participation and a long-term strategy to develop "homegrown" credentialing capacity.