Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Advisory Committees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules committee proposal to randomize advisory‑committee seat assignments draws board debate
Summary
SFUSD Rules Committee recommended associating citizen advisory‑committee seats with individual board members using a one‑time random draw to stagger terms and align future appointments. Several commissioners objected to randomness and urged alternatives (full‑board consensus, stagger by reelection year, waiving policy for one year); the issue will return to Rules on Nov. 20 for further vetting.
The Board’s Rules, Policy and Legislation Committee reported Oct. 16 that staff should proceed under committee direction to associate seats on board‑appointed advisory committees (including the QTEA/Prop A oversight committee) with individual board members by means of a random drawing. The stated purpose was to move from the prior practice of board‑level slate appointments toward a system that produces staggered terms aligned with board member terms.
Committee members said the recommendation came after examining several options to increase diversity and predictability in advisory appointments. Legal counsel and staff raised questions about the board’s existing policy language and whether the board could remove confirmed members mid‑term; counsel recommended clarifying policy language if removal options were to be added.
Multiple commissioners expressed discomfort with a strictly random assignment for existing seats, calling the process “random” and urging more deliberate outreach and nomination to ensure representation and continuity. Some commissioners proposed temporary waivers or one‑year appointments to bridge to a new system; legal staff and committee chairs said policy changes or waivers would need to be vetted in Rules and, where necessary, brought to the full board as amendments.
The committee made the appointment process a standing Rules item and scheduled further discussion and possible policy language revisions for the Nov. 20 Rules Committee meeting. Board members urged the committee to publicize future meetings and consider community venues to encourage parent participation.
