Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District proposes phased reduction of general‑education bus service to meet $3.42M target; 11 schools would lose service in year‑1 proposals
Summary
Staff proposed a three‑year plan to reduce general‑education transportation spending from about $6 million to $3.42 million with a fleet reduction from 44 buses to 25; year‑1 recommendations would remove service to 11 elementary schools and reduce service at four others while prioritizing CTIP‑1 access and after‑school stops.
Orla O'Keefe, presenting for the district transportation team, told the board that current routes date from the 1980s and do not reflect the board’s recent priorities. The presentation framed two objectives: align transportation with strategic priorities (choice, access for English‑learner communities, middle‑school feeder patterns) and reduce general‑fund contributions to transportation.
Staff reported current transportation spending of roughly $6,000,000 and a planned three‑year reduction to approximately $3,420,000. To meet those targets staff proposed a phased fleet reduction: 44 buses currently, 38 buses in 2011–12, 32 in 2012–13 and 25 by 2013–14. The reduction would require service changes; for year 1 staff recommended removing service to 11 elementary schools and reducing service to four others, while trying to avoid impacts to after‑school program stops and CTIP‑1 area access.
Staff described key assumptions driving the plan: that middle‑school feeder patterns and after‑school realignment will reduce transportation demand, that bell‑time changes may be necessary to maximize a smaller fleet, and that an enrollment process is needed so the district knows who rides the bus. Staff acknowledged these are assumptions and pledged a phased approach with community engagement in February and review of feedback in March and April.
Parents and CBO representatives raised concerns about after‑school impacts (several said the Jewish Community Center and other providers serve many district riders), data accuracy (parents reported inaccuracies in published stop lists), Muni reliability for student trips, environmental impacts of shifting riders to other modes, and the difficulty working families may have arranging alternate childcare or pick‑ups. Staff said year‑1 adjustments aimed to minimize after‑school disruptions, confirmed the ridership snapshot was drawn from November 2010 data, and committed to updating staff phone lines and web resources and to targeted outreach to communities such as Treasure Island via community partners.
Commissioners generally supported a phased approach but asked staff to provide more disaggregated ridership data, an environmental impact analysis, and concrete options for families who rely on bus service for after‑school care. Staff said the district would return with revisions after the February feedback period and that any board requests to change year‑1 recommendations would require offsetting changes to meet the six‑bus reduction target.
The board did not take a vote at the meeting; staff will collect community feedback in February, analyze implications alongside the new student‑assignment work, and present revisions to the board in March–April.
