Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethnic Studies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Francisco educators, students press board to adopt ethnic studies course
Summary
Faculty from San Francisco State and local teachers presented a proposal to institutionalize ethnic-studies in SFUSD high schools; about two dozen students and community members testified in support, citing increased engagement and learning. Board pledged further curriculum review and A–G alignment work.
San Francisco State faculty and local teachers presented an update and proposal to the San Francisco Board of Education on Jan. 12 to expand ethnic-studies offerings in district high schools, and students and community members packed the meeting to urge adoption.
Allison Tifianco Cubales of San Francisco State described a 40-year movement toward institutionalizing ethnic studies and framed the proposal around three goals: relevance, institutionalization and community. Teachers Amy Ritchell (Mission High School) and Kyle Beckham (Downtown High School) said classes link history, math and science in cross-curricular projects and boost student engagement. Beckham said the course “has the power to slow and stop the outflow of students” and called ethnic studies essential to making equity a reality in schools.
More than two dozen public speakers — including high school students, teachers and college faculty — testified in favor. Student speakers said the course expanded their knowledge of culture and history, increased interest in school and connected classroom work to community issues. Several presenters handed in petitions and sign-in lists documenting support; one teacher presented 161 signatures from colleagues supporting expansion of the curriculum.
Board members asked staff about alignment with A–G college-preparation requirements and funding. Superintendent Carlos Garcia told the board the district will need to review where ethnic studies best fits in the A–G framework and pursue approval as appropriate; he also asked staff to examine funding sources and the logistical steps needed to implement the course districtwide.
The board did not take a vote on the proposal that night. Commissioners said they expected further discussion at curriculum committee and subsequent board meetings so staff could return with details on A–G approval, costs and an implementation timeline. President Jane Kim thanked presenters and said the item will be part of continued committee work.
