Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays $99,000 contract with School Volunteers / Ed Fund pending clarity on scope
Summary
Commissioners questioned a roughly $99,000 contract with San Francisco School Volunteers (transitioning to the Ed Fund) over scope, overlap with parent‑engagement staff, and deliverables; staff described focused volunteer efforts at ~30 priority schools. The board requested further specifics and postponed final action.
Commissioner Feuer pulled K13 (listed as a contract with San Francisco School Volunteers) and questioned why the district would pay roughly $99,000 for services that she said sounded duplicative of work performed by parent liaisons and the district's family engagement office.
Deputy Superintendent (Vidya) Lee and staff described a long‑standing relationship with the volunteer organization: historically the group brokered and matched volunteers across the district, and in recent years it refocused to provide targeted support to roughly 30 priority schools and a smaller set of six "focus" schools. Staff said the contractor provides background checks, induction and training for volunteers, coordination of corporate volunteer events (playground builds, murals, cleanups), and some corporate fundraising and sponsorship activity that brings external resources to schools.
Multiple board members expressed concern that the contract description on the agenda packet did not clearly describe deliverables and that there may be duplication with district parent‑liaison work. Commissioner Wins, Commissioner Yee and others asked for a clearer accounting of what the district receives for the payment and the history of the annual contribution. Deputy Superintendent Lee agreed to provide a memo on the contract history, a clearer service description tied to district priorities and the number of schools directly served.
Given the outstanding questions about scope and potential overlap with existing family‑engagement work, commissioners asked staff to prepare a follow‑up briefing and, in the discussion, the board indicated it would postpone final action on the item until the next meeting to allow more information to be provided.
No final vote on the K13 contract occurred at this meeting; staff agreed to return with documentation on the program's activities, the rationale for district funding and possible alignment with APD/parent‑liaison responsibilities.
