Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board debates Mission Bay school planning; motion to proceed fails

San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education · February 10, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented preliminary planning for a potential new Mission Bay school to be funded with developer fees once 3,000 housing units were permitted; commissioners asked for demographic projections and enrollment details, and the motion to authorize the next-step planning failed on a roll call.

The Board discussed an initial proposal to begin planning for a potential new school at Mission Bay after developers permitted 3,000 housing units. Chief Facilities Officer David Golden told the Board the lot is eligible for a school once the housing threshold is met and that early work would combine academic planning with architectural design to align a school program with the neighborhood's biotech and research environment.

Board concerns and questions: Commissioners asked for demographic analysis (how many families and school-age children are expected among the new units), whether the proposed school would be a neighborhood school or district-wide program, and for clarification on funding. Golden said preliminary developer and city projections indicated school-age families were exceeding developers' initial expectations and that developer fees would fund initial planning and design work.

Vote and outcome: Several Board members said the item was premature without enrollment projections and clearer program goals; on a roll call, the motion to proceed failed.

Why it matters: Mission Bay is a major growth area in San Francisco; any new school would require coordination with the developer community, demographic study, and a clear academic program to justify capital and operational plans. Board members asked staff to return with more detailed demographic work and options before moving forward.