Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parcel Tax Distribution topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Proposal to let state charter association allocate parcel-tax funds fails after heated debate over inclusion of state-authorized Edison

Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District · June 24, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposal to have the California Charter Schools Association distribute a fixed parcel-tax allocation to local charter schools failed after board members objected to delegating allocation authority and including state-authorized charter operators such as Edison.

The board considered an MOU that would have the California Charter Schools Association (CCSA) act as a pass-through and distribution agent for a fixed parcel-tax allocation to charter schools. Staff and some commissioners described prior negotiations with local charter leaders and said the agreement was intended to provide a practical mechanism for distributing charter school portions of parcel-tax proceeds.

Commissioner Wins and others objected strongly to the inclusion of state-authorized charter schools (most notably Edison) in the distribution formula and to delegating allocation authority to a statewide advocacy organization rather than keeping distribution decisions local or within a district-held framework. Commissioner Wins said the State Board of Education had granted a charter in a political deal and argued the board should not empower the CCSA to allocate local parcel-tax funds. Other board members said charter leaders locally had requested the arrangement and that the CCSA was functioning as a neutral pass-through nominated by the charter schools themselves.

After extended debate on process and equity, the board voted on the MOU and the measure failed on roll call; the chair said the item would return to further negotiation and discussion.