Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Prop H Spending topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves amended Prop H spending plan, sets $6.56 million reserve amid state cuts
Summary
The San Francisco Board of Education approved an amended Proposition H public-education-enrichment spending plan for 2008–2009, directing a $6,561,752 reserve amid uncertainty over state funding and adopting a 25% reduction to one violence-prevention line item to preserve equity across schools.
The San Francisco Board of Education on Jan. 22 approved an amended spending plan for the public education enrichment fund (Proposition H) for the 2008–2009 school year, directing a $6,561,752 holdback as a reserve while the district pursues clarity on deep state budget cuts.
The board’s action follows staff and Community Advisory Committee work and a Committee of the Whole review. Staff and legal counsel told the board that language in Prop H is broad and that the recommended reserve is intended to bridge potential state reductions. The board added an amendment adjusting the violence-prevention allocation: rather than fully restoring last year’s level, members agreed to a 25% reduction from the recommended $1,175,000 (bringing the line to about $881,250) to distribute funds more equitably among schools. The amendment passed on roll call and the overall spending plan was approved by roll call.
Why it matters: The board said the reserve will give the district time to lobby Sacramento and to revisit spending after the May state “May revise.” Prop H funds are locally generated and intended to supplement — not supplant — state funding, a point several community speakers stressed during public comment.
What the board heard: Staff framed the decision as a response to unprecedented state budget uncertainty and recommended preserving committee records and a transparent amendment process by May 31. Legal counsel, Miguel Marquez, explained Prop H’s drafters intended to discourage the state from offsetting city funds; he said the third-third language permits a broad set of educational uses. Community speakers — including representatives from the CAC, United Educators of San Francisco, Coleman Advocates and Chinese for Affirmative Action — urged the board to honor Prop H’s intent and to avoid supplanting state funds. Sandra Feuer (Coleman Advocates, CAC member) quoted the charter’s language (section 16.123-9) warning against supplanting and urged caution.
On the amendment: Board members debated whether restoring full violence-prevention staffing would unfairly favor schools that had already hired staff. Several commissioners proposed alternative approaches, including spreading smaller amounts across all schools and defining eligible uses (programming rather than hardware). The board settled on a 25% reduction to the recommended amount to preserve parity; that amendment passed on roll call (recorded in the transcript as carried with four ayes) and was incorporated into the approved spending plan.
Public reaction and next steps: Union and community speakers generally supported holding a reserve in light of the fiscal crisis or asked for stronger definitions and oversight for how Prop H money is spent. Board members instructed staff to preserve all CAC minutes and proposals and to present any proposed changes by May 31; any revisions will be discussed in public meetings.
The board’s approval was accompanied by a clarified resolution text referencing the January 22 memorandum and attached spreadsheets as the official spending plan. The board plan will be revisited if state action or May-revise revenues allow further restorations or reallocations.
