Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Language Immersion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board backs expansion of Mandarin and other language-immersion programs
Summary
The board unanimously approved a substitute resolution directing staff to expand and strengthen Mandarin and other two‑way language-immersion programs and to produce a strategic plan (deadline set for March 2007) including a fiscal analysis and community engagement requirements.
The San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education voted unanimously on Sept. 12 to adopt a substitute resolution supporting the expansion and strengthening of Mandarin and other two‑way language-immersion programs.
Commissioners said the resolution grew from sustained parent advocacy, task force work and committee input and includes a requirement that staff develop a strategic, community-oriented plan for future program placements. The resolution directs staff to produce a fiscal analysis of proposed programs, analyze the Mandarin-speaking population and other language groups, and identify outside funding sources. The board amended an earlier deadline of January to March to allow additional planning time.
Speakers at the meeting included parents and representatives from Parents for Public Schools (PPS) Immersion Task Force and ACE (Advocates for Chinese Education). Several parents described long waiting lists, the importance of continuity for immersion students through middle and high school, and the view that immersion programs support higher academic achievement. One presenter said a petition of more than 800 signatures had been delivered to the superintendent and board in support of a demand‑driven approach to program placements.
Commissioners emphasized equity and asked staff to ensure that expansion does not unintentionally increase segregation. The resolution calls for staff to work with the bilingual community council and community groups on program placement, to partner with local higher-education institutions for professional development, and to report back with a comprehensive strategic plan by March 2007.
The board’s unanimous vote reflected broad support for immersion programs while flagging the need for careful planning to preserve access and equity across neighborhoods and student groups.
