Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cannabis Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves indoor cannabis cultivation at 1719 Wallace with odor-control and security conditions

San Francisco Planning Commission · October 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission granted conditional-use authorization to convert a vacant Bayview warehouse at 1719 Wallace Avenue into an indoor cannabis cultivation facility, subject to HVAC/carbon-filtration, security and licensing conditions after residents raised concerns about odors and perceived industry saturation in Bayview.

The Planning Commission on Oct. 10 approved a conditional-use authorization for indoor cannabis cultivation at 1719 Wallace Avenue in the Bayview Hunters Point PDR‑1B district, subject to conditions addressing odor control, security and regulatory compliance.

Planning staff described the project as a change of use for a vacant 2,500-square-foot warehouse that would house approximately 1,700 square feet of cultivation space. Staff noted the applicant is an "equity applicant" and that no exterior changes are proposed; the change requires state licensing (Department of Cannabis Control) and San Francisco Office of Cannabis permits and subsequent building‑permit review for mechanical, fire and health codes.

Project designer Fiona and owner Mr. Liu explained outreach to the Bayview CAC and presented a neighborhood policy plan that includes a mechanical mitigation strategy (HVAC and carbon filtration to control odor), 24/7 security, camera monitoring, and local hiring/community partnership commitments with nearby urban-agriculture groups.

Multiple residents — including several who spoke through translated remarks — urged denial, saying Bayview already hosts numerous cultivation operations and that existing odor and public-safety problems linked to cannabis activity have harmed neighborhood quality of life. "We don't need more marijuana shops," one translated speaker said, arguing the area needs retail, grocery and community services instead. Another resident said repeated CAC meetings had not always been effective at elevating translated community input.

Technical staff and the project's mechanical engineer described carbon filtration and air‑exchange systems commonly used in cultivation facilities and said such systems will be reviewed and approved during building‑permit and Office of Cannabis reviews. Project supporters said the facility is not retail and will not be open to the public.

After deliberation commissioners voted 5–1 to approve the conditional‑use authorization with conditions that include a detailed odor‑control plan (carbon filtration specification and maintenance schedule), a neighborhood policy (security and local hiring commitments), and a requirement to secure all necessary city and state cannabis licenses and building permits. Commission President So cast the lone vote against approval.

What happens next: The applicant must obtain state and city cannabis licenses and complete building- and fire-safety reviews before operations may begin; the Office of Cannabis and DBI will review mechanical and filtration plans to verify odor-control systems meet standards.