Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Major Housing Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission certifies EIR and approves entitlements for 469 Stevenson, a 495‑unit transit‑oriented housing project

San Francisco Planning Commission · April 20, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission certified the final EIR and approved CEQA findings and project entitlements for the 469 Stevenson Street development, a 27‑story, 495‑unit mixed‑use project including 73 on‑site affordable units; EIR certification passed unanimously and the package of approvals passed 4‑2.

Planning Department staff presented the recirculated Final Environmental Impact Report for 469 Stevenson Street and concluded the document complies with CEQA and addresses issues raised in prior review (historic resources, geotechnical, and displacement). The project sponsor proposes to demolish a surface parking lot and construct a 27‑story mixed‑use building with approximately 495 dwelling units, 4,000 square feet of ground‑floor retail, about 30,000 square feet of private and common open space, 178 parking spaces, and 73 on‑site below‑market‑rate units achieved through a requested state density bonus. The project has been certified by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research as an SB 7 Environmental Leadership Development Project and the sponsor committed to union labor and greenhouse‑gas neutral construction.

After public testimony that included dozens of both in‑person and remote supporters and a handful of written oppositions focused on traffic and construction impacts, the commission voted to certify the Final EIR (6‑0). Commissioners then voted to adopt the CEQA findings and approve the Downtown Project Authorization and Conditional Use Authorization with conditions; that vote passed 4‑2, with two commissioners voting no. Staff read into the record clarifying language distinguishing required public benefits from voluntary community benefits provided by the sponsor. The commission’s approval does not itself begin construction; subsequent permitting and conditions in the approval must be satisfied and the project will continue into building permit and construction phases.