Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission declines to take discretionary review on 984 Corbett addition after shadow study, neighbors object to light loss

San Francisco Planning Commission · March 16, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Neighbors asked the commission to take discretionary review of a proposed two‑ and fourth‑story addition at 984 Corbett Ave citing sunlight and privacy impacts; staff and commissioners concluded proposed setbacks and a shadow study did not show extraordinary circumstances and voted 6–0 not to take review.

Neighbors opposing a proposed rear and vertical addition at 984 Corbett Avenue urged the commission to take discretionary review on March 16, arguing the project would shade their rear yard and kitchen and reduce usable outdoor sunlight. Clara Dutton, the requester, presented photos and testimony about limited sun hours and the effect on her family’s use of the patio and garden.

Staff recommended not taking discretionary review, noting the proposal complies with the planning code and residential design guidelines and that articulations and setbacks reduce impacts: the second floor is set back three feet from the north lot line, the third floor five feet and stepped back an additional 15 feet from the proposed rear wall of the floor below. The sponsor’s counsel and architect said the proposal includes terraced setbacks and that a shadow study shows the addition would not cast more shadow than alternatives such as a 6‑foot fence.

Callers and nearby longtime residents described prior loss of sunlight after earlier approvals and urged the commission to preserve sun access. Commissioners reviewed plans and shadow studies and concluded there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances warranting discretionary review; a motion not to take discretionary review and to allow the permit to proceed passed unanimously, 6–0.