Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves 1 Oak Market Street redevelopment over narrow 4-3 vote
Summary
The Planning Commission approved findings and downtown project authorization for the 1 Oak redevelopment at 1500—1540 Market Street, including a $35.5 million in-lieu affordability fee; three commissioners voted against the project citing missing design information and community impacts.
San Francisco ' The San Francisco Planning Commission voted 4-3 on July 14 to approve overriding considerations, shadow findings and a downtown project authorization for the redeveloped project at 1500—1540 Market Street ("1 Oak"). The decision followed hours of technical questioning and public comment.
Nick Foster, planning department staff, summarized the application as a re-entitlement that increases unit count from 304 to 460 and recommended approval. "The department stood very steadfastly behind the project and recommends approval," Foster said.
Commissioner Moore, who voted against the measure, raised an extensive series of concerns about the completeness of the submittal and life-safety and design details. "The drawings for Floors 34 to 39 are missing," she said in deliberations, and asked for clearer information on vertical circulation, fire-department approvals, the status of a solarium/roof exemption, and public open-space changes.
Project attorneys and architects said the proposal retains the prior land-use program while increasing unit count to address current financial feasibility; they also described an in-lieu housing fee estimated at $35,500,000 that sponsors say could be directed toward neighborhood affordable housing projects. The sponsor said that, under current methodologies, that package could finance roughly 142 affordable units off-site.
After discussion, the commission approved the project on a 4-3 vote (Aye: Diamond, Fung, Coppell, Tanner; No: Ruiz, Imperial, Moore). The acting zoning administrator subsequently found that the project met the findings for the requested height exemption and parking setback variance.
The project will proceed to subsequent building-permit review and related technical peer review processes (DBI and other agencies) where questions about fire exiting, final facade details, and CEQA compliance will be further evaluated.
Commissioners and staff emphasized the need for continued community engagement and for the sponsor to finalize technical plans before building permits are issued.
