Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission hears city's COVID recovery framework centered on equity
Summary
Planning staff and city departments presented a recovery strategy focused on racial equity, housing stabilization and small-business support; directors flagged funding constraints, a 9-site RFQ for affordable housing in Central SoMa, and the need for data-driven performance metrics.
The San Francisco Planning Commission on Dec. 3 heard an informational presentation on the city's COVID-19 recovery strategy that emphasized racial equity, housing stabilization and small-business recovery.
Director Hillis introduced the department's role coordinating with the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development and the Office of Economic and Workforce Development. Joaquin Torres, director of OEWD, told commissioners the pandemic's economic impacts remain severe: "Our unemployment rate of 6.9% is still more than twice as high as our pre-COVID numbers," and he said nearly 39,000 fewer residents had jobs compared to December 2019. Torres said the data show Latino residents are disproportionately affected.
Why it matters: presenters and public commenters said recovery choices will shape who benefits as neighborhoods reopen. Eric Shaw, director at the mayor's housing office, noted the city has used emergency and philanthropic funding for stabilization programs including Give2SF, which provided emergency rental assistance to more than 1,400 households, and described a recently issued RFQ for nine city-controlled sites intended for affordable housing.
Commissioners pressed staff on implementation details. Commissioner Moore asked how renewed state restrictions would affect immediate strategies; Torres responded that new restrictions "absolutely" complicate recovery and make state and federal resources even more important. Commissioners also sought details on the 9-site RFQ and the possibility of reusing office or hotel space for housing. Shaw said the sites were city acquisitions or dedications and that MOHCD had issued an RFQ and would be seeking nonprofit partners to develop the affordable housing parcels.
Budget and capacity questions surfaced. Staff acknowledged a planning department fee-revenue shortfall (about $19 million for the year) and said some priorities will require reallocation or new resources. Commissioners asked about fee deferral proposals, streamlining entitlements, and digital permitting; staff said ADU intake had moved to fully electronic submittal and that scaling electronic permitting beyond ADUs is an active effort.
Public commenters including housing advocates and tenants'union representatives urged centering equity and neighborhood-specific supports. Corey Smith of Housing Action Coalition said he supported the housing-focused recommendations; Anastasia Yovanopoulos of the Tenants Union urged commissioners to weigh equity in project reviews.
The presentation was informational and no formal action was required; staff said they will return with follow-up briefings and more detailed topic-specific hearings.
