Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 500 Jones Cannabis topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves cannabis retail conversion at 500 Jones after rejecting request for discretionary review

San Francisco Planning Commission · December 5, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After competing testimony from Tenderloin neighbors and service providers, the commission declined to take discretionary review (no exceptional circumstances found) and approved the building‑permit application to convert a corner market to a cannabis retail store at 500 Jones Street (equity applicant), 5–1.

The Planning Commission on Dec. 5 declined to take discretionary review of — and effectively approved — a building‑permit application to convert an existing corner market at 500 Jones Street into a cannabis retail establishment operated by an equity applicant.

Planning staff recapped objections from neighbors who sought discretionary review on the basis that the Tenderloin is an extraordinary context with concentrated vulnerability (high homelessness, many children in housing, documented loss of corner markets) and argued the shop’s conversion would worsen access to daily needs retail and neighborhood safety. Staff concluded the concerns were not an "exceptional and extraordinary" circumstance that would justify discretionary review and recommended approval.

Opponents — including the adjacent church leadership and Tenderloin community groups — urged denial, citing high crime rates, the loss of a multi‑product market and vulnerability of local children. Supporters from veteran and homelessness organizations argued a regulated dispensary provides safer access to medicine for people who need it and can fund programming for vulnerable residents. The applicant proposed security, 24‑hour video surveillance, and a commitment not to pursue on‑site consumption.

After hearing testimony from both sides and community groups proposing partnerships for harm‑reduction and supportive programming, the commission voted 5–1 not to take discretionary review and to approve the building permit as proposed (Commissioner Fung dissented). Staff noted permit conditions and interagency review (DBI routing to Department of Public Health) for tenant improvements.