Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Transbay Parcel F Gpa topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission initiates Transbay Parcel F general‑plan amendment despite shadow concerns

San Francisco Planning Commission · December 5, 2019

Summary

The Planning Commission voted to initiate a general plan amendment to clear the way for a 61‑story mixed‑use tower at 542–550 Howard (Parcel F). Commissioners and community members pressed project sponsors to continue outreach on shadow impacts to nearby Chinatown parks.

The Planning Commission voted Dec. 5 to initiate consideration of a general plan amendment for Transbay Parcel F, a proposed 61‑story tower that would include residential, hotel and office uses and reach up to about 750 feet in height.

Nick Foster, planning staff, reminded commissioners that a prior transit‑center district plan had allocated shadow budgets for nearby parks and that the Parcel F proposal would add an incremental 0.1% to the allowable shadow on Willie Woo Wong Park. He said the impact would be limited in time and season and noted prior joint commission decisions that increased park shadow budgets for the district.

Several commissioners and community speakers pressed for further detail on shadow timing and minimization measures. Project counsel said the sponsor had narrowed the tower massing and that a more slender residential tower would reduce shadow relative to the earlier TCDP study. An applicant representative said outreach with Chinatown organizations had been productive and asked the commission to initiate the GPA so entitlements could be heard in January.

Commissioners voted to initiate the general plan amendment and schedule hearings on or after Jan. 9, 2020. Several commissioners asked staff and the sponsor to continue engagement with Chinatown groups and to return with clearer documentation about shadow timing and design options.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source