Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Land Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Balboa Reservoir master‑plan presented; community divided over density, open space and City College parking
Summary
City staff and a developer team presented a public‑land housing master plan for the 17‑acre Balboa Reservoir site: a proposed ~1,100‑unit plan with a 50% affordable target from the CAC, four acres of open space and coordinated access with City College. Public comment reflected support for housing and concern about scale, parking and transit mitigation; a draft EIR is due this summer.
City staff and the selected developer team presented the Balboa Reservoir public‑land housing proposal at the Planning Commission’s June 13 meeting, laying out the community process, CAC development parameters and a model to deliver up to about 1,100 housing units with a 50% affordability goal.
The site is a 17‑acre San Francisco Public Utilities Commission parcel adjacent to City College and Ocean Avenue. The planning team described a master plan with four acres of open space (including a minimum 1.5‑acre park), a mix of affordable and market housing (the developer team proposes roughly 50% affordable overall, with a roughly one‑third of that financed by cross‑subsidy and the city identifying gap funding for the balance), a large childcare facility, educator housing, and commitments to sustainability and transportation demand‑management.
The developer team (Reservoir Community Partners: BRIDGE/ Avalon Bay/ Mission Housing/ Habitat for Humanity) described massing that steps down toward single‑family neighborhoods and preserves a central reservoir park. Designers stressed connections with City College (pedestrian pathways and coordinated parking solutions) and said they are coordinating the master plan with the college’s facilities master plan.
Public comment was extensive and divided. Many neighborhood residents and organized groups supported housing on public land but urged a reduced unit count, preservation of contiguous open space, and stronger guarantees for City College parking and the planned Performing Arts & Education Center. City College faculty and student speakers urged keeping land in public hands or ensuring replacement parking; unions and community groups called for fully public ownership or 100% affordable uses. Other speakers, affordable‑housing advocates and developers emphasized the scale of the city’s housing crisis and supported maximizing affordable units while noting the city will need to identify gap subsidies to reach 50% affordability.
Planning staff said a draft Environmental Impact Report will be released later this summer and that anticipated alternatives include lower‑density options raised during public scoping. The city anticipates an EIR certification and project approvals in roughly a year, with detailed mitigation and parking/transportation analysis to be developed in the environmental review.
