Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Change Of Use 201 Nineteenth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission rejects request to convert Richmond'area grocery to restaurant after neighbors oppose change
Summary
The commission voted 6-0 to disapprove a conditional use authorization to convert a neighborhood grocery at 201 Nineteenth Avenue to a restaurant, citing community opposition, potential loss of neighborhood-serving retail and unresolved tenant/landlord disputes.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to disapprove a conditional use authorization for a change of use from a grocery store to a restaurant at 201 Nineteenth Avenue. David Weisglass, Planning Department staff, said the department had received three letters of support and 34 letters of opposition plus petitions totaling hundreds of signatures; on balance staff recommended disapproval, finding the change of use "not compatible with the general plan, nor necessary and desirable for the community."
The project sponsor presented interior and exterior renderings and a breakfast-lunch menu with most items priced under $15. Neighbors and multiple public speakers — including Margaret Rafferty, who said she collected roughly 700 signatures opposing the change — told the commission they did not want a restaurant replacing an existing market and raised concerns about parking, concentration of eating uses and the proximity of an adjacent church.
Commissioner Johnson said she could not support the project because it "seems neither necessary nor desirable to the community" and because the tenant remained in place and could be displaced. A motion to disapprove the conditional use authorization was moved and seconded; the commission recorded aye votes from Commissioners Hillis, Johnson, Moore, Richards, Coppell and Commission President Melgar and the motion passed 6-0.
Speakers included the market owner, who said the landlord had notified him of a rent increase that would double his monthly rent from $3,050 to $6,000, and community representatives who urged mediation. Supervisor Fewer's office offered assistance for mediation but did not take a formal position.
The commission's action was a clear denial of the change-of-use request; staff and neighbors indicated mediation or lease negotiations remain separate pathways outside this discretionary CU process.
