Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mission neighbors press Planning Commission to delay 344 Fourteenth project over affordability, PDR and infrastructure concerns
Summary
A proposed mixed-use project at 344 Fourteenth Street drew lengthy public opposition over low on-site affordability (8 BMR units), PDR rent and viability, geotechnical and sewer concerns, and traffic and bike-safety impacts; commissioners continued the item to June 6 for more community engagement and technical follow-up.
A contentious hearing on a proposed mixed-use development in the North Mission dominated the Planning Commission's April 4 meeting. The sponsor seeks approval for a large project at 344 Fourteenth / 1463 Stevenson: a new residential building with 56 units, ground-floor retail and new PDR / small-enterprise workspace.
Staff described the project as a combination of rental housing, PDR space and retail with on-site below-market-rate (BMR) units. Project proponents emphasized job-training partnerships and the incoming small-enterprise workspace. However, community groups and neighbors urged the commission to pause the entitlement, arguing the proposal does not meet Mission-area needs.
Speakers from Mission No Eviction, the SF Tenants Union and other neighborhood organizations said the project's proposed affordability rate (the project sponsor increased the inclusionary rate in plan materials, but commenters argued it remained insufficient given current displacement pressures). They said that the project's PDR space would be priced beyond the reach of local manufacturers and artists, pointing to letters from the Mayor's Office of Economic and Workforce Development flagging concerns about the PDR business plan and likely rental rates.
Residents and small-business owners also raised technical and infrastructure concerns. Speakers cited geotechnical reports and historic groundwater and sewer issues on Woodward Street and warned that dewatering and large foundations could worsen drainage or damage neighboring structures. Others described increased traffic, ride-hail activity and dangerous interactions with existing bike lanes.
The commission and staff heard extensive testimony and asked the sponsor to return with additional details on PDR affordability, phased delivery of dedicated affordable sites (where applicable), and specific mitigations for sewer, groundwater and traffic impacts. Given the volume of public concern and outstanding technical questions, the commission voted unanimously to continue the matter to June 6 to allow additional outreach and technical responses.
