Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environmental Review topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission opens public comment on 30 Otis Street draft EIR; planners flag unavoidable historic and transportation impacts

San Francisco Planning Commission · July 19, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented the Draft EIR for the 30 Otis Street project, which would demolish several buildings for a large residential tower and identified demolition of a historically eligible building as a significant and unavoidable impact; public comment highlighted arts uses and streamlined approvals.

Julie Moore, the project EIR coordinator, presented the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed 30 Otis Street project. The proposal would demolish five existing buildings, merge the lots and construct a residential building with a 10-story podium and a 27-story tower, totaling roughly 485,000 square feet and including new studios and performance space intended for the City Ballet School. The Draft EIR finds demolition of the 14–18 Otis Street building a significant and unavoidable impact on a historic resource; several other project- and cumulative-level impacts (notably transportation circulation and cumulative wind) were also identified as significant and unavoidable despite mitigation.

Moore said Historic Preservation Commission staff concurred that demolition of the eligible resource is a significant impact but also noted the HPC recommended adoption of the project due to overriding considerations. The public comment period for the DEIR was announced to run through 5 p.m. on July 27, 2018; comments and responses will be published in a subsequent document prior to certification.

Speakers during the public comment period included Laura Clark (YIMBY Action), who praised the project's housing potential and urged reflection on discretionary processes; and Ken Patzell, administrative director of City Ballet, who described the project as critical to the school's survival and appreciated the inclusion of dedicated arts space. Commissioners asked clarifying questions but no certification or approval was requested at this hearing; the commission opened the record for public comment on adequacy, accuracy and completeness under CEQA.