Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Production topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mayor's directive aims to speed approvals to sustain 5,000 housing units a year; Planning staff to present implementation plan
Summary
Planning staff described a mayoral executive directive directing departments to streamline permitting with targets and quarterly reporting; commissioners supported expedited implementation while stressing the need to preserve meaningful community input.
Get email alerts on the Housing Production topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Department staff briefed the commission on a mayoral executive directive intended to accelerate housing approvals across city departments. The directive sets an aspirational target of maintaining a 5,000 units per year production rate and asks departments involved in housing permitting to shorten internal timeframes tied to CEQA and entitlement steps.
Director Ram told the commission the directive sets specific process timeframes (6–22 months depending on CEQA and project type), requires quarterly reports to OEWD on progress and asks the planning department to submit an implementation plan to the mayor by Dec. 1. Ken Rich of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, who joined the briefing, framed the directive as an operational push to keep the city’s pipeline moving: “As we recovered from the great recession, we added more than a 140,000 jobs to San Francisco. But during that time period, we only approved 15,000 housing units,” he said, arguing the city needed faster permitting and stronger post‑entitlement coordination.
Commissioners welcomed the aim but pressed for safeguards. Commissioner Johnson and others stressed that streamlining should not shortchange meaningful community participation; several commissioners asked staff to consider tools such as a countdown for entitlements or revocation hearings when entitlements sit unused. Director Ram and OEWD staff said the directive is non‑legislative (it directs staff work) and that some legislative changes might be proposed later to address revocation/entitlement duration and other policy levers.
Commissioners requested quarterly briefings and asked to schedule an informational hearing before the department’s Dec. 1 implementation date. Staff said the directive asks departments to identify senior managers to oversee process improvements and to return with operational measures, including potential legislation, staffing assignments and reporting frameworks.
