Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retail Formula Retail topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clement Street merchants object to Cricket Wireless; Commission signals intent to disapprove and continues the matter
Summary
Merchants and small-business owners mounted organized opposition to a Cricket Wireless outlet on Clement Street, arguing the store opened without a CU and threatens neighborhood retail character. The Commission registered an intent to disapprove and continued the matter to April 27.
A contested conditional use authorization for a Cricket Wireless store at 524 Clement Street drew intensified merchant opposition at the April 13 Planning Commission hearing.
Planning staff reported that 79 letters opposing the proposed Cricket Wireless unit had been received along with 51 letters of support; the surrounding neighborhood commercial district historically prioritizes neighborhood-serving independent retail. Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer told the Commission she was concerned the Cricket outlet "attempted to circumvent our formula retail regulations by moving into this space without even applying for conditional use authorization." She urged the Commission to consider the broader effect on neighborhood character.
Representatives for the franchisee and authorized dealer said the operator did not realize the store needed prior conditional use authorization and that they were now pursuing the proper process; the sponsor's representatives emphasized the small physical size of the leased space and the local customer base.
Longstanding merchants — including Green Apple Books and the Clement Street Merchants Association — described how formula retail can displace owner‑operated small businesses and increase rents. Green Apple asked the Commission to respect the code—s broader criteria beyond simple formula-concentration tests, pointing to Planning Code sections that require evaluation of character, preservation of neighborhood-serving retail and the uniqueness of neighborhood commercial districts.
After extended public comment, a motion of intent to disapprove the Cricket Wireless conditional use was made and the Commission voted to continue the matter to April 27 for formal action. Commissioners indicated they wanted the sponsor and the Planning Department to address neighborhood concerns and to verify the timeline of occupancy, tenant displacement claims, and whether the operator circumvented the permitting process.
No final conditional use decision was made on April 13; the continuance preserves the planning record and schedules a two‑week follow‑up hearing to give staff and the parties time to assemble additional documentation.
