Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Design Guidelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission hears hours of public comment on proposed Urban Design Guidelines
Summary
Planning Department presented proposed Urban Design Guidelines to apply to mixed‑use and commercial districts; the presentation prompted long public comment from neighborhood groups, architects and merchants asking for clearer graphics, carve‑outs for neighborhood commercial districts and stricter protections for historic areas.
San Francisco—— Planning Department staff presented draft citywide Urban Design Guidelines at the May 11 meeting of the Planning Commission, seeking a more consistent, implementable set of standards to guide design review in mixed‑use and commercial areas. Staff said the guidelines are intended to reinforce policies in the general plan and existing area plans and to provide clearer expectations for site design, architecture and the public realm.
The commission was briefed on the guidelines——by Maya Small and other staff, who said the effort is meant to make city design policies more usable by listing specific recommendations and illustrative examples. The draft would apply in most mixed‑use and commercial districts, with limited applicability in residential zones for larger sites.
That presentation was followed by an extended public comment period. Speakers included neighborhood groups, historic‑preservation advocates, architects and the American Institute of Architects——San Francisco chapter. Common concerns were that the draft is too broad for distinctly different neighborhood commercial districts, that it lacks enough clear diagrams and measurable standards (especially on light wells, roof decks and facade rhythm), and that the city should allow neighborhoods to craft their own supplements rather than a single citywide code.
Several neighborhood representatives urged the commission to exclude Named Neighborhood Commercial Districts and historic districts from the new guidelines or to require neighborhood‑specific addenda before the city applies the draft rules. Preservation specialists recommended restoring certain architectural elements and warned that some existing alterations would be incompatible with the area——if not carefully managed.
Staff said outreach has included an advisory group, more than 20 neighborhood meetings and a revised draft with additional examples; staff asked the public to submit comments by May 30 and said it planned to return with a refined draft in June, aiming to resume formal consideration in July. Commissioners and commenters emphasized the need for clearer graphics, a stronger distinction by scale, and mechanisms to preserve fine‑grain neighborhood character while improving design review efficiency.
The commission did not vote on the guidelines at the May 11 meeting; staff will incorporate the outreach feedback into a new draft and return to the commission for next steps.
