Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Soup Kitchen 1928 Mission topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves Mary of Nazareth soup kitchen at Mission Street despite neighbor opposition
Summary
After two hours of public testimony for and against, the San Francisco Planning Commission voted 6–0 to deny discretionary review and approve the relocation of the Fraternite Notre Dame Mary of Nazareth soup kitchen to 1928 Mission Street, with commissioners citing the sisters' track record and staff findings that the use is principally permitted and meets planning-code standards.
The San Francisco Planning Commission on Jan. 12 voted unanimously to deny discretionary review and approve the relocation of the Mary of Nazareth soup kitchen to 1928 Mission Street, clearing the way for the Fraternite Notre Dame to reopen a long‑running meal program displaced by rent increases.
Supervisor Hillary Ronan urged commissioners to approve the move, saying the Mission is “one of the most special neighborhoods in San Francisco” and that the sisters’ work is “essential” during a housing and food‑security crisis. Tom Tunney, counsel for the sisters, told the commission the order has run a clean, orderly operation at its previous location and has modified its design to avoid impacts on the building’s light wells, including ventless stove hoods.
Opponents — principally homeowners in the 1930 Mission Street building above the proposed site and nearby residents — argued the location is wrong for a soup kitchen because of existing street congestion, queuing and safety concerns. Multiple speakers described encounters with drug paraphernalia and encampments on the block and warned that a daily queue of hundreds of meals could exacerbate loitering. “This is not the right location,” said one long‑time resident, citing nearby schools and families.
Supporters included local service groups, clergy and neighborhood organizations who said the Mission lacks formal meal services and that the sisters are experienced operators who can run a managed, respectful program. Laura Guzman of the Mission Neighborhood Resource Center said the community lacks a formal food facility and credited the sisters with effective street‑front management in other neighborhoods.
Staff recommended approval, noting the proposed use is principally permitted under the planning code, replaces a vacant tenant space, and includes a management plan for limited hours, entry controls and neighbor outreach. The commission’s discussion emphasized both sympathy for neighbors’ quality‑of‑life concerns and confidence in the sisters’ ability to operate responsibly; several commissioners urged ongoing good‑neighbor coordination with police and service providers.
The commission’s final motion, to deny discretionary review and approve the proposal as presented, passed 6–0. The hearing record shows substantial neighborhood concern about potential queuing and street impacts, and the decision leaves implementation details (hours, queue management, a community liaison) to the project’s conditions and follow‑up with city staff.
What happens next: With the commission’s approval, the project sponsor may proceed with permits and final tenant improvements consistent with the conditions adopted by staff and the commission. Neighbors who requested discretionary review were heard at the hearing and their concerns are recorded in the minutes; enforcement of the sisters’ good‑neighbor measures will be a focus during occupancy and operations.
Sources: Planning Department staff presentation and the public hearing record.
