Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission votes at a glance: Dec. 1, 2016

San Francisco Planning Commission · December 1, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Key actions: consent calendar approved; adoption of minutes; Commerce & Industry amendment recommended 6–1; 1296 Shotwell affordable seniors project approved; 5 Thomas Mellon mixed‑use project approved; Black Sands hours extension approved; 160 Gilbert MCD continued to March.

Here are the principal actions recorded at the San Francisco Planning Commission hearing on Dec. 1, 2016:

• Consent calendar: Motion to approve routine consent matters (listed conditional use authorizations) passed unanimously and items were approved by roll call.

• Item 9 (Minutes): Draft minutes for Nov. 10 and Nov. 17, 2016 adopted; roll call reflected unanimous approval in the transcript.

• Item 13 (Commerce & Industry element amendment): Commission recommended removing numeric caps on eating/drinking uses from the general plan and keeping specific calculations in the planning code, with a modification to strike language that said such concentrations 'should not be permitted.' Vote: 6–1 (Commissioner Moore opposed).

• Item 16 (1296 Shotwell — 100% affordable seniors housing): Planning authorization approved for a 9‑story, 94‑unit building under the Affordable Housing Bonus Program with conditions. Vote recorded as unanimous in transcript.

• Item 17 (701 Haight / Black Sands CUA): Staff recommended and the commission approved hours extension (amended to limit very late hours to weekend nights and require good‑neighbor conditions). Vote: 6–0.

• Item 18A/B (5 Thomas Mellon Circle, Executive Park): Commission approved conditional use authorization and permit review for a 585‑unit project (72 on‑site affordable), with a condition requiring the sponsor to work with OEWD on a tenant relocation assistance plan. Vote: unanimous as recorded.

• Item 19 (160 Gilbert — MCD discretionary review): After extensive resident opposition citing narrow dead‑end alley and delivery concerns, the commission continued the matter to March to allow the sponsor to submit a detailed operations and delivery mitigation plan. Vote to continue: 4–2.

These items reflect the commission’s mix of regulatory policy work, major development approvals, procedural votes and responses to strong public testimony during the Dec. 1 hearing.