Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Plan Restaurants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission considers removing specific restaurant‑density numbers from General Plan, defers for more outreach
Summary
The commission debated a proposal to remove numeric concentration limits for eating and drinking uses from the Commerce & Industry element and rely on the planning code's 300‑foot calculation instead; after public concern (notably from Telegraph Hill), Commissioners voted to continue for staff outreach and clarification of neighborhood impacts.
San Francisco — On Oct. 6, 2016, the Planning Commission examined a staff proposal to revise the Commerce & Industry element of the General Plan that would remove explicit numeric limits on concentrations of eating and drinking establishments and leave measurement and enforcement to the Planning Code.
Monica Mohan, Planning Department staff, told the commission the general plan had become “very specific over the years” and that the department wanted the plan to remain a citywide vision while keeping fine‑grained calculations in the planning code. "The general plan should be the vision statement and our code should be that implementing tool," Mohan said.
Public speakers including Paul Webber of Telegraph Hill Dwellers urged caution, arguing removing the numerical guidance from the general plan would shift substance from long‑range policy to code technicalities and could make it harder for communities like North Beach and Telegraph Hill to preserve neighborhood character. "We believe it's premature to just basically spot items," Webber said.
Commissioners discussed how overconcentration should be measured — citywide percentages versus the planning code's 300‑foot radius — and whether neighborhoods should retain the ability to set corridor‑specific rules. Commissioner Richards said he supported moving the specifics into code but urged staff to work with affected neighborhood groups. Director Ram emphasized the department's intent was to correct an inconsistency and not to change the planning code.
After further discussion about outreach to Telegraph Hill and North Beach and about producing clearer guidance on what constitutes a “high percentage,” the commission voted to continue the item so staff can consult with neighborhood stakeholders and return with revised language and implementation steps.
