Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Major Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission Approves Lennar's 1515 South Van Ness Project After Negotiations on PDR, Trade Shops and Affordability

San Francisco Planning Commission · August 11, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission approved Lennar's proposed 157‑unit mixed‑use development at 1515 South Van Ness following weeks of outreach and bargaining with the Latino Cultural District: sponsor increased on‑site affordability to 25% and added trade shops and union labor commitments; opponents raised displacement and design concerns but staff recommended approval.

The Planning Commission voted to approve a proposed 157‑unit mixed‑use project at 1515 South Van Ness after several rounds of community meetings and last‑minute concessions by the sponsor.

Sponsor Lennar agreed to increase on‑site below‑market housing to 25% (39 units) and to provide six trade‑shop spaces at below‑market rents intended for local artists and small producers. Lennar also committed to 100% union construction and to a Costa Hawkins agreement covering the proposed affordable units. As presented by Lennar, the project includes ground‑floor trade shops, union labor guarantees, and mechanisms to coordinate with the Latino Cultural District on tenanting of PDR/retail spaces.

Speakers from Calle 24/Latino Cultural District and other community groups urged a continuance and sought higher on‑site affordability, stronger PDR replacement and guarantees that in‑lieu fees would be spent within the cultural district. Supporters — local merchants, unions and community organizations — praised the negotiated changes, the trade shops, union jobs and increased affordable units.

Commissioners debated whether to continue the hearing to give community groups more time; the sponsor said further delay risked appeal and financing uncertainty. After staff confirmed the project complied with applicable interim controls and that sponsor commitments addressed many community priorities, the commission moved to approve with conditions to continue staff and sponsor coordination on design details and trade‑shop sizing. The motion passed (recorded in transcript as a unanimous roll call among participating commissioners at that time).