Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
San Francisco Planning Commission asserts attorney–client privilege, moves into closed session and votes not to disclose
Summary
At a May 19, 2016 special meeting the San Francisco Planning Commission voted to assert attorney–client privilege for items to be discussed in closed session, recess into closed session, and later voted 7–0 not to disclose any portion of those discussions, reporting no action in open session.
SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco Planning Commission voted on May 19, 2016 to assert attorney–client privilege for matters listed for discussion with legal counsel, recessed into closed session and, upon returning to open session, unanimously voted not to disclose any portion of the closed-session discussions.
During the special meeting, the commission’s moderator introduced Item 2, a motion “to assert the attorney client privilege regarding the matters…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
