Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Noe Valley addition after neighbors and sponsor reach on-record concessions
Summary
The commission approved a multi-level addition at 1188 Diamond Street after neighbors raised concerns about demolition vs. remodel, historic-district compatibility and shadowing; the sponsor committed to design concessions (setbacks, reduced parapet and glass railing) and the commission declined discretionary review and approved the project.
The Planning Commission approved a discretionary-review item for additions and alterations to a single-family dwelling at 1188 Diamond Street in Noe Valley.
Staff concluded the project met residential design guidelines and recommended the commission not take discretionary review. Neighbors raised concerns about whether the work constituted a demolition rather than a remodel, potential shadowing of adjacent roof decks and compatibility with the historic-district context. "Just because it's being done doesn't mean that it's okay," neighbor Georgia Schutish said, arguing the packet comparisons and precedents required closer scrutiny.
Project counsel Brett Gladstone described design concessions made to address neighbor concerns, including a 15-foot front setback for the new top floor, a 7-foot-2 side setback for the top floor and deck, removal of a parapet that could cast shadow, and clear (not cable) glass at a side railing. Neighbor representatives requested a modest additional rear setback to protect a downhill neighbor’s sole roof-deck play area; the sponsor said the requested two-foot change would require redesign and new engineering and could not be accepted on the record.
After discussion and with the record of concessions noted on the public record, Commissioner Antonini moved not to take discretionary review and to approve the project; the motion passed unanimously (6–0).
