Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Market Octavia topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff presents Market Octavia monitoring report as residents warn of displacement
Summary
Planning staff told the commission the Market Octavia monitoring report (2010–2014) shows net housing growth, a pipeline of thousands of units and hundreds of affordable units tied to subsidies, while public commenters warned the plan has contributed to gentrification and urged clearer accounting of impact fee spending.
Audrey Harris of the planning department presented the Market Octavia implementation monitoring report covering 2010–2014 and described housing, commercial and transportation trends in the plan area. She said the area added net new units during the period and that 398 of those newly constructed units were affordable; most of those affordable units were publicly assisted or produced through inclusionary housing requirements. Harris told the commission that, as of late 2015, there were over 4,600 units in the pipeline and that just over 3,100 units were under review by planning, with 1,038 permitted for construction.
The report also showed shifts in commercial space and jobs, a reduction in residential parking provided per unit, and a summary of impact fees collected and projected. Harris said roughly $3,000,000 in impact fees were collected from 11 housing development projects during the reporting period and that $8,700,000 had been collected as part of the community improvement program; staff projected about $19,000,000 in impact fee revenue over the next five years to support transportation, open‑space and greening improvements.
During public comment, longtime community advocate Sue Hester urged the commission to publish a written report rather than rely on an oral presentation and argued the plan has coincided with displacement and demographic change in the area. Hester said the planning department should be transparent about how much affordable housing came from state actions versus the Market Octavia plan and requested greater clarity in the report. Several commissioners acknowledged the report's detailed data while also noting displacement pressures and gaps in the record on how affordable‑housing fees are spent. Commissioner Johnson asked staff to follow up with the Mayor's Office of Housing to clarify expenditures for affordable‑housing impact fees.
Commissioners and staff discussed parking and the hub area work that will examine parking ratios, traffic, and the potential for ramping down residential parking ratios for new development. Director Grama confirmed the department will provide the full monitoring report to commenters on request and said the department plans to publish the data tables online.
The item was informational and required no action by the commission. The department said the Market Octavia monitoring report will be available on the planning department website and at dataSF, and staff are preparing additional outreach on Hub planning and parking adjustments.
