Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Large Project Authorization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board upholds Planning Commission on 925 Bryant large-project authorization
Summary
The Board of Appeals denied an appeal challenging the Planning Commission27s approval of a 7‑story, 218‑bedroom project at 925 Bryant Street, concluding the commission did not abuse its discretion; commissioners cited planning and SDAT review and state density‑bonus constraints.
Get email alerts on the Large Project Authorization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Board of Appeals on Sept. 14 denied an appeal of the Planning Commission27s approval for a seven‑story housing project at 925 Bryant Street, upholding the commission27s exercise of discretion.
Appellant counsel raised concerns about locating the building27s only garage entry on Langton Street (a partly private, partly public alley), the multiple easements affecting the private portion of that alley, and whether planning had adequately analyzed the project27s impacts under the general plan. The appellant also argued that the waivers and incentives granted under the state density‑bonus law would cause undue harm to adjacent properties.
Project counsel John Kevlin and Planning zoning administrator Corey Teague said the project completed the multi‑department SDAT (streetscape) review, that the alley frontage is public for roughly the first 250 feet and that city policy and a 2018 code amendment favor locating vehicle access on the alley rather than on the transit‑preferential Bryant Street. Kevlin also emphasized the project would deliver 35 deed‑restricted affordable units and provide a state-mandated density bonus tied to those units.
Planning staff and DBI noted technical mitigation and construction controls would apply, including a construction minimization plan and coordination with SFMTA for construction traffic. After deliberation the board voted 3–0 to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission27s determination, finding that the commission did not commit error or abuse its discretion under the review standard for appeal.
What happens next: with the appeal denied the Planning Commission27s approvals stand and the project sponsor may proceed through building-permit steps subject to standard construction and traffic mitigation requirements.
