Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedural Calendar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves multiple continuances; President Fong recuses on one item
Summary
The Planning Commission handled a busy continuance calendar: President Fong recused himself from item 3 because of a proximity/ownership issue, commissioners approved a package of continuances for multiple items (motion passed unanimously), and later moved items 7 and 8 to Oct. 1 (votes passed 6‑1 and 7‑0 respectively).
The San Francisco Planning Commission acted on a crowded continuance calendar early in the hearing, addressed a recusal and scheduled several items for future hearings.
An unidentified speaker asked for a short continuance, and commissioners discussed available October dates. President Fong recused himself from item 3 because it is adjacent to property he partially owns; commissioners moved and seconded a recusal.
Following public comment urging certain items be calendared together, Commissioner Richards moved to continue several items with specific dates (for example, item 1 and 2 to Sept. 24; item 3 to Oct. 8; and parts of item 5 to Oct. 15). That motion was seconded and passed unanimously.
Later in the meeting the Commission considered scheduling for other items: after discussion about calendar constraints and public availability, the Commission voted to continue item 7 to Oct. 1 (the motion passed 6‑1 with Commissioner Richards dissenting) and to continue item 8 (901 Sixteenth Street) to Oct. 1 by unanimous vote (7‑0). Project sponsors and public commenters on both sides asked the Commission either to hear items sooner or to ensure enough public notice to allow attendance.
Commissioners repeatedly referenced the practical limits of the hearing calendar and the need to get projects scheduled promptly while balancing community access. The meeting adjourned after completing the continuance votes and a brief set of Commission matters.
